The name Frank Bodi is quickly making waves in the financial sector, but for all the wrong reasons. The seasoned broker, recognized by his CRD #: 1107838, was recently shown the door by his employer, Landolt Securities. The dismissal came after allegations surfaced of Bodi’s involvement in off-channel communications, a serious violation of firm policies.
Are the allegations true?
According to Bodi’s BrokerCheck record accessed on March 5, 2024, this is not the first time he’s been caught up in a whirlwind of regulatory actions, customer disputes, and employment separations. The troubling string of disclosures dates back nearly three decades, to 1997. So, what does this mean for the investors he worked with?
For a brokerage firm, the ability to supervise its broker is of utmost importance. Off-channel communications, like the type Bodi is alleged to have been involved in, are strictly prohibited. This is because they restrict the firm’s ability to monitor its brokers, creating a potential breeding ground for violations. Investigations are ongoing, but investors have reason to pay attention to this unfolding story.
Not Bodi’s first rodeo with regulator’s wrath
In December 2016, Bodi fell foul of regulators once again. The FINRA struck him with a penalty following an Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent agreement (AWC). It was revealed that Bodi had been executing discretionary trades without receiving the necessary written authorization from his clients, and without approval from his firm.
FINRA Rule 3260 mandates brokers to receive written authorization from their clients before engaging in discretionary trading. Discretionary accounts also need firm’s approval before any trading can take place. Bodi’s inability to adhere to these regulations led to a 15-day suspension and a financial fine of $5,000.
Bodi’s Profile: A glance into his experiences
Bodi has been in the industry for an impressive 39 years and has passed the Series 65 Uniform Investment Adviser Law Examination, Series 63 Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination, Securities Industry Essentials Examination, and the Series 7 General Securities Representative Examination. He has an extensive employment history, having worked with ten firms including well-known names like Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, and UBS Painewebber.
His big list of credentials and the wealth of experience on his resume makes this situation even more shocking. For someone who’s worked with a number of firms and passed multiple examinations, the lack of compliance is concerning.
What’s next for aggrieved investors?
If you have invested with Bodi and have concerns about your investments, it’s advisable to seek legal counsel. Experienced securities attorneys can help aggrieved investors understand their rights and potentially recover lost funds.
For nearly two decades, securities attorneys have tirelessly advocated for investors, helping them recover investment losses from brokers and brokerage firms. Always remember, it’s crucial to take decisive action once securities fraud is suspected.
Bodi’s story serves as a stark reminder of the importance of diligent financial management. As tempting as it can be to entrust all the reins to a broker, it’s essential to keep an eye on your investments and actively participate in managing your financial future.
